Arguing that a defendant’s conviction for website hacking should be overturned because legitimate, highly valuable security and privacy research commonly employs techniques that are essentially identical to what the defendant did and that such independent research is of great value to academics, government regulators and the public even when – often especially when — conducted without a website owner’s permission.
Location
United States
See map: Google Maps
Read Full Story from Of Interest http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/our-work/cases/us-v-auernheimer
This article by Center for Internet and Society originally appeared on cyberlaw.stanford.edu on October 04, 2016 at 01:18AM
