Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Motion mitigation for lung cancer patients treated with active scanning proton therapy

Motion interplay can affect the tumor dose in scanned proton beam therapy. This study assesses the ability of rescanning and gating to mitigate interplay effects during lung treatments.

The treatments of five lung cancer patients [48 Gy(RBE)/4] with varying tumor size (21.1–82.3 cm3) and motion amplitude (2.9–30.6 mm) were simulated employing 4D Monte Carlo. The authors investigated two spot sizes ( ∼ 12 and ∼3 mm), three rescanning techniques (layered, volumetric, breath-sampled volumetric) and respiratory gating with a 30% duty cycle.

For 4/5 patients, layered rescanning 6/2 times (for the small/large spot size) maintains equivalent uniform dose within the target >98% for a single fraction. Breath sampling the timing of rescanning is ∼2 times more effective than the same number of continuous rescans. Volumetric rescanning is sensitive to synchronization effects, which was observed in 3/5 patients, though not for layered rescanning. For the large spot size, rescanning compared favorably with gating in terms of time requirements, i.e., 2-rescanning is on average a factor ∼2.6 faster than gating for this scenario. For the small spot size however, 6-rescanning takes on average 65% longer compared to gating. Rescanning has no effect on normal lung and mean lung dose (MLD), though it reduces the maximum lung dose by on average 6.9 ± 2.4/16.7 ± 12.2 Gy(RBE) for the large and small spot sizes, respectively. Gating leads to a similar reduction in maximum dose and additionally reduces and MLD. Breath-sampled rescanning is most successful in reducing the maximum dose to the normal lung.

Both rescanning (2–6 times, depending on the beam size) as well as gating was able to mitigate interplay effects in the target for 4/5 patients studied. Layered rescanning is superior to volumetric rescanning, as the latter suffers from synchronization effects in 3/5 patients studied. Gating minimizes the irradiated volume of normal lung more efficiently, while breath-sampled rescanning is superior in reducing maximum doses to organs at risk.



Read Full Story from Medical Physics: Most Recent Articles http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapm/journal/medphys/42/5/10.1118/1.4916662?TRACK=RSS
This article by Clemens Grassberger, Stephen Dowdell, Greg Sharp and Harald Paganetti originally appeared on scitation.aip.org on April 21, 2015 at 05:27PM

Latest Posts